tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post3531727501050135163..comments2008-07-11T14:01:23.118-04:00Marc Dingmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14938086179275233750marcdingman@yahoo.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-16919670698879438032008-07-11T13:49:00.000-04:002008-07-11T13:49:00.000-04:00Good list of all blogs on neuroscience.Very helpful.Thank you<BR/>VictorThe Journeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05008441817832323779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-49797307660905735002008-07-08T21:15:00.000-04:002008-07-08T21:15:00.000-04:00I'm inclined to think that science began when someone eons ago descovered that they could make there own light and heat useing fire.Gabriellehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07611971818007057323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-50079567364124161742008-07-08T19:12:00.000-04:002008-07-08T19:12:00.000-04:00Maybe I'm guilty of being a little too dramatic. On the other hand, I wouldn't, as a student of biology, take offense to a cosmologist saying that all roads in science lead back to a patent office in Berne, in 1905. Considering how scientific knowledge is built upon preexisting foundations, aren't both statements true? Maybe there can be more than one signpost on the road of science history?Marc Dingmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14938086179275233750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-10464568104569502862008-07-08T05:10:00.000-04:002008-07-08T05:10:00.000-04:00"all roads in science today lead back to July 1st, 1858, at the Linnean Society"???<BR/><BR/>I don't think a cosmologist or particle physicist would agree with that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-39260227003258474922008-07-07T20:11:00.000-04:002008-07-07T20:11:00.000-04:00Christo,<BR/><BR/>Thank you! After reading his name a countless number of times, it never registered with me that there was one "l" (probably because I'm so used to spelling the name with two). Now I know! Thanks,<BR/><BR/>MarcMarc Dingmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14938086179275233750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-18197969653929992892008-07-07T19:57:00.000-04:002008-07-07T19:57:00.000-04:00Alfred Russell Wallace should be Alfred Russel Wallace (one ell).christohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00462688444895424388noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-90702862790659510802008-07-07T15:27:00.000-04:002008-07-07T15:27:00.000-04:00Thanks Alvaro! I enjoyed writing it and hope to host again in the future.Marc Dingmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14938086179275233750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8948118800667522559.post-60493750236527659242008-07-07T11:00:00.000-04:002008-07-07T11:00:00.000-04:00Marc, a very nice edition! beautiful lead, and great write-up. Thank you!AlvaroFhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13448313414422007523noreply@blogger.com