The first week in July is a time of great significance—one that reminds us of change, revolution, and how an age-old view of the world can be drastically altered by the persistent belief in one's own novel ideas. This, of course, is because July 1st marks the anniversary of the presentation of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace's independently-developed theories of evolution and natural selection to the Linnean Society of London. The reading represented the first public explanation of the theory, which would eventually come to be the foundation upon which the world of science rests. Last week's anniversary is a special one, marking the 150th year since the publication. So, as you peruse Encephalon's round-up of the latest and greatest neuroscience blogging, remember that all roads in science today lead back to July 1st, 1858, at the Linnean Society.Cognitive Daily describes what makes voices more or less attractive.
Neurophilosophy provides an intriguing look at the brain's ability to reorganize itself after a cerebrovascular accident. It appears that cells in the brain are much more versatile than once thought.
Neuroanthropology looks at the relationship between music and movement, and how it is manifested in the drumming that accompanies Sundanese martial arts demonstrations, as well as gives us a rational perspective on the debate over the biological origins of homosexuality, and a good reason to relax.
Sharp Brains discusses how physical exercise and mental exercise compare in improving the health of your brain. An interview with Dr. Art Kramer from the University of Illinois provides a way to engage in both forms of exercise at the same time: walking book clubs! And, tests to determine "brain age" are called into question.
The Winding Path provides an in-depth description of the co-evolution of the brain and culture, and then focuses specifically on the evolution of complex social interaction.
Brain Blogger asks if religion has neural or supernatural roots, and looks at the ramifications of implanting microchips containing medical information in patients.
Finally, The Neurocritic takes Science to task for not practicing what it preaches about fMRI translation. He also summarizes a unique review article that uses Dilbert cartoons to help explain the neural correlates of prediction error signals.
Be sure to check out the next edition of Encephalon at Sharp Brains on July 21st. Send your submissions to encephalon{dot}host{at}gmail{dot}com.
8 comments:
Marc, a very nice edition! beautiful lead, and great write-up. Thank you!
Thanks Alvaro! I enjoyed writing it and hope to host again in the future.
Alfred Russell Wallace should be Alfred Russel Wallace (one ell).
Christo,
Thank you! After reading his name a countless number of times, it never registered with me that there was one "l" (probably because I'm so used to spelling the name with two). Now I know! Thanks,
Marc
"all roads in science today lead back to July 1st, 1858, at the Linnean Society"???
I don't think a cosmologist or particle physicist would agree with that.
Maybe I'm guilty of being a little too dramatic. On the other hand, I wouldn't, as a student of biology, take offense to a cosmologist saying that all roads in science lead back to a patent office in Berne, in 1905. Considering how scientific knowledge is built upon preexisting foundations, aren't both statements true? Maybe there can be more than one signpost on the road of science history?
I'm inclined to think that science began when someone eons ago descovered that they could make there own light and heat useing fire.
Good list of all blogs on neuroscience.Very helpful.Thank you
Victor
Post a Comment